Use the form at the right to log in for more options.
Stop crying and grab the ball.
I thought all of you would enjoy this amusing little anecdote. At the baseball game the other day, a player hit a high foul ball down the left field side. The ball got stuck in a light fixture just below the upper deck seats. A man sitting directly above the light fixture held his toddler by the foot and dangled him over the side to retrieve the ball. The kid seemed terrified to be hanging almost 100 feet above the lower seats, but he did his duty and grabbed the ball. His father pulled him back to safety and the fans gave them a polite round of applause.
None of that is true, but just for laughs, I asked a lawyer friend if that hypothetical parent would run any legal risk for putting his son in grave danger to retrieve a $5 baseball. Although my friend’s specialty isn’t criminal law, he told me that prosecutors aren’t likely to charge parents for anything that doesn’t actually harm their children. My legal advisor added that had the father been going after an important baseball—like Barry Bond’s record home run—he definitely wouldn’t be charged if he dropped his kid, even if the judge isn’t a huge baseball fan. Things happen. Maybe dad had some mustard on his hands—mustard he got on his hands from wiping his careless child’s face—or maybe the kid was wiggling too much, or maybe the father was distracted by the next pitch which the batter sent over the center field wall for the game-winning run, and the kid just slipped. Is that the father’s fault? What's the guy supposed to do, not clap when somebody hits a game-winning homerun? And you call yourself a fan?
My lawyer friend did advise me that an essay poking fun at recklessly endangering the lives of children poses some possible legal ramifications. I have decided to change everything by saying that the guy at the baseball game lowered his wife by her ankle to get the baseball—his wife who is an adult and is not pregnant. One of my female friends quickly pointed out that this scenario is demeaning to women.
So how about this: The guy climbs out on the ledge to get the baseball himself and falls to his death. There, are you happy now? An innocent man dies trying to obtain a priceless memento of a wonderful day he has spent watching a baseball game with his son. Maybe the kid has cancer or something, I don't know. Had the man used his son to retrieve the ball, the two of them would probably be home by now playing catch with an official Major League baseball. Instead, one of them is dead and it happens to be the breadwinner of the household, not just another mouth to feed.
Doesn’t it make more sense to let the father lower his kid to get the ball? Sure, there will be a few cases—as I mentioned—where the father’s hands are greasy from a hotdog, so his grip is compromised, but even in the worst-case scenario, if someone has to die to retrieve a foul tip, would you really rather see the father fall from the upper deck instead of the son? What if the kid grows up to be a terrorist or a drug dealer? You are really going to feel like a horse’s butt then, aren’t you?
It all becomes a little more complicated when you look at the big picture, so consider that the next time you see a parent jeopardizing the life of a child. Perhaps you should just mind your own business and watch the game. I have never caught a baseball at a game before, so I would be the last person to judge how another fan retrieves a ball. Now, using a kid as a human shield to protect you from a scorching line drive is probably just plain wrong, but maybe there are some valid reasons for such actions. If I’m sitting down the left field line and Vladimir Guerrero is batting I look around for a protection—it could be a kid, a beer vendor, or the team mascot. It’s complicated.
Personally, I'd be for lowering a senior citizen. If they got the ball, great! If something terrible were to happen, they've got one foot in the grave anyway. Plus... no more burden. Seems win-win to me.
Eugene
yeah ok pal
()
Post #: 2
Posts: Rank: n/a Joined:
n/a
Location:
n/a
Posted: 9/5/2006 11:16:40 AM
did you think this was funny when you wrote this confusing, barely coherent drivel? It sounds like you ate an eighth of boomers, thought you had a brilliant idea and tried desperately to craft intelligible sentences. But because you were so preoccupied with trying to make sense, you forgot to be funny. How's that for some on point analysis?
Graham MacDonald
Good
()
Post #: 3
Posts: Rank: n/a Joined:
n/a
Location:
n/a
Posted: 9/5/2006 11:59:38 AM
Imagine a TPP where all articles have the same origionality as this one.
Jared
To OD
()
Post #: 4
Posts: Rank: n/a Joined:
n/a
Location:
n/a
Posted: 9/5/2006 2:14:50 PM
Old people are kind of brittle. What if their foot comes off as you are lowering them to get the ball? You'd look pretty silly standing their with a foot in your hand and no baseball to show for your effort.
Ray
Don't mind Eugene
()
Post #: 5
Posts: Rank: n/a Joined:
n/a
Location:
n/a
Posted: 9/8/2006 12:51:59 PM
He's harmless. He lives in the utility closet, been there for years although no one has ever seen him. He is a timid little creature that lives on the internet.
Eugene
I read this again
()
Post #: 6
Posts: Rank: n/a Joined:
n/a
Location:
n/a
Posted: 9/12/2006 2:18:28 PM
and I thought that it was absolutely hilarious. Brilliant stuff, John. Must have missed something on the first reading. We should hand out.
Use the form at the right to log in for more options.
Posts: 
